Caltaxletter

David R. Doerr, principal contributor
Ronald W. Roach, editor 


Vol. X, No. 38
November 24, 1997

 BOE DELAYS ACTION ON USE TAX PAYMENT REGULATION; SETS LEGISLATIVE AGENDA

The State Board of Equalization last Thursday delayed action on a staff request to authorize publication of Use Tax Direct Payment Permits Regulation 1699.6. Meeting in Sacramento, the board voted 3-2 to wait until January to consider forms and other implementing measures.

The BOE's Business Taxes Committee recommended a delay after hearing public testimony critical of immediate action.

Carrie-Lee Coke, representing the California Manufacturers Association (CMA), stated that there is no need to rush a regulation to reallocate use tax. She said that CMA would like to be involved in the drafting of the regulation.

Albin C. "Al" Koch, representing Municipal Resource Consultants, suggested that there is no rush to publish the regulation. Mr. Koch outlined his firm's objections to the current proposed pooling formula. He stated that the author of SB 110 (Senator Ralph Dills) verbally indicated that estimates could be used to allocate the use taxes. He suggested that the BOE issue a bulletin by January 1, 1998 to set procedure and follow later with the regulation.

At the full board meeting, Chair Ernest Dronenburg said there was no target date to begin the program in SB 110. "There is a lot of uncertainty. It needs a lot of study," he said, telling staff, "Bring the forms to us in January and we will start the process."

Member Dean Andal said staff had overestimated the number of permits (7,500) that would be issued. He supported the motion, as did Rex Halvorsen, representing Kathleen Connell. Members Johan Klehs and John Chiang voted against it.

Mr. Dronenburg, also the committee chair, questioned the need to add 22 staff to administer the program and also indicated no urgency in publishing a regulation. He asked staff to work with public parties to fashion the regulation.

In other action, the committee approved publication of Regulation 1593, "Aircraft and Aircraft Parts," and reviewed the 1996-97 Business Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Annual Report.

Meanwhile, the BOE Legislative Committee, led by Mr. Klehs, last week approved legislative proposals for 1998 that include:

Property Taxes

Business Taxes Sales and Use Tax Special Taxes Other BOE developments:

CONNELL CALLS FOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF FTB

Speaking at the Franchise Tax Board's California Tax Policy Conference in San Francisco on November 6, State Controller Kathleen Connell called for a top-to-bottom performance audit of the Franchise Tax Board. Dr. Connell said she is also hopeful she can persuade the governor and Legislature to order a performance audit of every department. She pointed to the successes of a partial performance audit of the State Board of Equalization and a full performance audit of the controller's office.

Dr. Connell, who serves as FTB chair, told an audience of largely tax practitioners and business representatives that she had helped eliminate a number of small, unfair nuisance taxes that increase blood pressure of taxpayers more than they increase revenue.

For next year, Dr. Connell said she was going to push for zero-based budgeting, consolidation of the FTB and BOE, a two-year budget cycle, and a four-year capital improvement plan. She urged the budget process be an open one, and was critical of the process of developing a major tax bill behind closed doors on the last night of session.

She also said that she will be announcing an audit of the California education system next month.

Other conference developments:

(Editor's note: Our November 10 issue covered developments of the conference up to Caltaxletter deadline. This story covers developments subsequent to that time.)

FTB HEARS TAXPAYER RECOMMENDATIONS AT BILL-OF-RIGHTS HEARING

A majority of the three-member Franchise Tax Board has agreed to send a signal of support for AB 417 (Davis) on collective combined reporting, but without a controversial unitary definition amendment inserted into the bill late in the 1997 session.

FTB Chair Kathleen Connell and Member Ernest Dronenburg made the commitment last Monday at a Taxpayers' Bill of Rights hearing, where the public was invited to make suggestions about franchise and income tax law. Abstaining was Finance Director Craig Brown.

Representing ARCO and the Counsel on Unitary Tax (CUT), Barry Weissman asked the board to support collective combined reporting as provided in AB 417, giving taxpayers the option of filing a report with all affiliate companies, whether unitary or not. However, he asked the board to oppose inclusion of a unitary definition. The bill will still be pending when the Legislature reconvenes in January.

Mr. Weissman said the bill should not have been amended in September to include a new definition in unitary standards for non-electors. He said the change should be avoided because it is unnecessary, counterproductive, premature and unworkable. The amendment uses unclear terms, and there is no agreement on standards, he added.

Mr. Weissman said the unamended bill would improve certainty to taxpayers. He continued that the fiscal impact to the state would not occur until the fourth year or beyond. He cited one remaining obstacle: taxpayers who do not elect combined reporting could be thrown into uncertainty if the bill is allowed to include a unitary definition.

Others commenting before the board included Richard Harris, representing Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. He proposed that the board and department should emphasize collection of "the proper tax" only and not be driven by the pursuit of revenue. He continued that the public needs a perception of "fairness and equity," and he requested the board to commit itself to the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights proposals he submitted at last year's hearing. He called for a commitment to fair hearings and requested support of standards that would prohibit what he termed coercive practices by audit and collector staff.

Mr. Harris suggested that consideration of a shift of the burden of proof would be desirable. Gerald Goldberg, FTB executive officer, responded that many of Mr. Harris' recommendations are largely contained in current and administrative procedures. Mr. Goldberg said the agency would look at the appeals process to make it more staff-accessible and non-punitive.

Other FTB action last Monday included:

 OAL APPROVES BOE'S INTERNET REGULATION

The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) has given final approval to the State Board of Equalization's Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1684, relating to the application of the tax to out-of-state retailers who use an instate Internet service provider. With OAL approval, the regulation is effective Thursday, November 27, for which taxpayers can be truly thankful. The regulation provides that an out-of-state retailer is not "engaged in business" in this state within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6203 if the retailer's only contact with this state is: (1) the use of a computer server on the Internet to create or maintain a home page on the World Wide Web, or (2) the use, under defined conditions, of an in-state independent contractor performing repair services on behalf of such retailer. It also provides that on-line service providers will not be deemed the agent or representative of any out-of-state retailer.

COURT: SLOW ASSESSMENT BOARD MEANS USE OF TAXPAYERS' VALUE

Taxpayers are entitled to use their values when a county Assessment Appeals Board (AAB) fails to make a timely determination, a state appellate court has ruled (Mission Housing Development Company, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco).

The First District Court of Appeal on November 12 overturned in part the trial court's judgment that the San Francisco AAB could deny a number of applications for reduction in Glenridge apartment assessments filed by taxpayers for tax years 1985-86 and 1986-87. However, the trial court was affirmed in part for disallowing refunds for tax years 1982-83 through 1984-85 and 1987-88.

Plaintiffs said the AAB failed to hear and make a final determination on their applications within two years as required by Section 1604 (c) of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The city argued that the taxpayers had waived the two-year requirement. The court ruled, however, that the city failed to plead waiver and estoppel issues as affirmative defenses in its answer, and could not rely on those defenses.

The decision said the AAB failed to inform the taxpayers of their lack of a full and complete filing of information on their applications, a requirement of state law.

The conclusion that taxpayers' value must be used applies only for tax years 1985-86 and 1986-87; otherwise the court found that taxpayers' claims were not timely filed.

UI TAX RATES SHOULD GO DOWN IN 1998

California employers should see a reduction in their unemployment insurance (UI) tax rates beginning January 1, 1998, saving $170 million in the coming year and more than $520 million over two years. The Employment Development Department's latest projections show the tax rate schedule for 1998 will move to the "D" schedule. Employers currently are on the "E" schedule.

The state's Unemployment Insurance Fund is projected to end the year with a $3.64 billion balance, $460 million higher than forecast in May. Exceptional economic growth during 1997 has slowed disbursements from the fund (benefit payments) as well as increased contributions to the fund (larger workforce). Employer contributions for 1997 are forecast to be $3.04 billion, with 1998 contributions forecast to decline to $2.87 billion. On the "E" contribution rate schedule, employer tax rates range from 1.1 percent to 5.4 percent of the first $7,000 in wages for each employee. The "D" schedule ranges from 0.9 percent to 5.4 percent.

California's UI Fund has been steadily rebuilding following a dramatic draw-down on reserves during the last recession. Saving the fund from potential red ink was its healthy reserve when the recession began. The year-end fund balance in 1990 had reserves of $5.4 billion, but dipped to a low of $2 billion by the end of 1994.

On the "D" schedule, employers will again be able to participate in California's "voluntary contribution" plan. This allows employers to voluntarily pay an additional amount into their UI reserve account in order to reduce their tax rate for the year. This option is available only when the "D" or lower schedule is in effect.

PINOLE VOTERS REPEAL UTILITY TAX WITH PROP. 218 INITIATIVE POWERS

Voters in Pinole (Contra Costa County) on November 4 probably were the first to flex the tax-repeal muscle of Article XIII, Section C of the state Constitution. This section, providing initiative powers to repeal a tax, was added in November 1996 when statewide voters approved Proposition 218.

Jonathan Coupal, legal affairs director for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA) and the main drafter of the "vote-on-taxes" Proposition 218 initiative, said he believes Pinole's Measure F was the first use of the new Section C powers. A lawsuit against the non-voted utility user tax was blocked by a statute-of-limitation problem, Mr. Coupal said, so the plaintiffs mounted an initiative campaign to repeal the levy. Measure F passed, 1,837 to 1,752.

Also, the Pinole City Council, as part of a settlement of the HJTA lawsuit, agreed to put a real estate transfer tax on the November ballot as Measure G. Voters rejected the proposal.

RECORD NUMBER OF SCHOOL BOND MEASURES ARE ATTEMPTED

Surveying all 58 counties, School Services of California, Inc. (SSC), found a record 46 general obligation bonds for school facilities were attempted on November 4, with a record-tying 25 of them passing. The number of attempts surpassed the mark of 39 set in November 1995. The record for approvals on one election day, 25, had been established last June when 38 districts sought bonds.

Successful elections amounted to more than $675 million, led by Pasadena Unified's $240 million. Losers totaled about $579 million.

One election in Santa Barbara County had been too close to call, trailing by one vote in initial ballot counting. But a later count turned up the needed vote, election officials reported last Wednesday. The final vote was 202 to 101 -- the two-thirds margin needed -- for the $2 million bond to modernize and expand the Los Alamos Elementary School District school for class-size reduction.

A new strategy was noted in the SSC report. As a result of legislation effective last January (SB 1544, Peace, of 1996) districts can gerrymander themselves to enhance chances of bond passage.

Splitting the district for taxation purposes was used by the Kings River Canyon Joint Unified School District, where eight previous bond elections had failed, the last two by about 30 votes out of some 10,000 cast. Attempting to isolate the anti-tax voters, the Fresno County district was split into two parts. One had a $26 million bond, the other a $3 million proposal.

The results: The pro-tax section of the district was "indistinguishable" from the anti-tax section, wrote SSC's Bob Blattner, and "the new strategy proved un- or even counter-productive." About 56 percent of voters in each section supported the respective bonds, which was down some 10 percent from March and November 1995 elections when the district voted as a whole.
 

POTPOURRI: SYMPOSIA, SIGHTINGS, SALUTES & SNAFUS

LAO: POSITIVE FISCAL OUTLOOK. Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill last Thursday reported that California's "fiscal outlook is positive for the next couple of years." The report, called California's fiscal Outlook, presents economic and budget projections through 1999-2000. She attributes the state's good fiscal health to continued healthy economic expansion and moderate revenue growth and ongoing declines in key health and welfare program caseloads. Also cited is the decision by Governor Pete Wilson to pay off the $1.2 billion Public Employees' Retirement System debt in one lump sum, providing "room" for spending in other areas in subsequent years. The general fund budget will be able to accommodate commitments made in 1997, the report said. It said revenues will grow about 5 percent a year, even after accounting for the phase-in of the tax-cut package.

KNOX CHAIRS ASSEMBLY REV & TAX COMMITTEE. The new chair of the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee says his main thrust is to look out for concerns of working families. Upon his appointment by Speaker Cruz Bustamante, Los Angeles Democrat Wally Knox said on November 6: "I will focus on how state tax policy affects California's middle-class families and pursue an agenda that addresses economic insecurity among average working people."
 

COMING UP

Dec. 2: BOE MEETING WITH ASSESSORS
Location: Room 121, 450 N Street, Sacramento at 9:00 a.m.

Dec. 15: ASSEMBLY REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE HEARING
Location: State Capitol, Room 447, at 9:30 a.m.
Subject: Mixed tax status of health systems.

Correction: In the last issue, the research and development credit for 1998 and thereafter was printed as 12 percent. This was a typo. The correct rate is 11 percent.
 
 

Taxletter Section  Member Section  Home 
© Copyright 1997, California Taxpayers' Association. All rights reserved.