David R. Doerr, principal contributor
Ronald W. Roach, editor
Vol. X, No. 38
November 24, 1997
BOE DELAYS ACTION ON USE TAX PAYMENT REGULATION;
SETS LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
The State Board of Equalization last Thursday delayed
action on a staff request to authorize publication of Use Tax Direct Payment
Permits Regulation 1699.6. Meeting in Sacramento, the board voted 3-2 to
wait until January to consider forms and other implementing measures.
The BOE's Business Taxes Committee recommended a
delay after hearing public testimony critical of immediate action.
Carrie-Lee Coke, representing the California Manufacturers
Association (CMA), stated that there is no need to rush a regulation to
reallocate use tax. She said that CMA would like to be involved in the
drafting of the regulation.
Albin C. "Al" Koch, representing Municipal Resource
Consultants, suggested that there is no rush to publish the regulation.
Mr. Koch outlined his firm's objections to the current proposed pooling
formula. He stated that the author of SB 110 (Senator Ralph Dills)
verbally indicated that estimates could be used to allocate the use taxes.
He suggested that the BOE issue a bulletin by January 1, 1998 to set procedure
and follow later with the regulation.
At the full board meeting, Chair Ernest Dronenburg
said there was no target date to begin the program in SB 110. "There
is a lot of uncertainty. It needs a lot of study," he said, telling staff,
"Bring the forms to us in January and we will start the process."
Member Dean Andal said staff had overestimated the
number of permits (7,500) that would be issued. He supported the motion,
as did Rex Halvorsen, representing Kathleen Connell. Members Johan Klehs
and John Chiang voted against it.
Mr. Dronenburg, also the committee chair, questioned
the need to add 22 staff to administer the program and also indicated no
urgency in publishing a regulation. He asked staff to work with public
parties to fashion the regulation.
In other action, the committee approved publication
of Regulation 1593, "Aircraft and Aircraft Parts," and reviewed the 1996-97
Business Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Annual Report.
Meanwhile, the BOE Legislative Committee, led by
Mr. Klehs, last week approved legislative proposals for 1998 that include:
Property Taxes
-
Revise administration of the welfare and veteran's organization
exemptions. Assessors requested that the final exemption decision be at
the county level.
-
Allow the board until August 31 of each year to notify
assessors of prescribed changes to the property statements to be used for
the ensuing lien date.
-
Facilitate the effective administration of the Private
Railroad Car Tax.
-
Allow for exemption from the timber yield tax those
harvests that are not economical to administer, and amend the Public Resources
Code to require that documents transmitted to the BOE contain information
sufficient to identify timber owners qualifying for an exemption.
-
Include the Private Railroad Car Tax Law under the state
tax lien provisions.
Business Taxes
-
Require that interest be imposed on a daily, rather
than monthly, basis under the sales and use tax and special taxes and fees
programs administered by the board. (Probable effective date is January
1, 1999.)
-
Allow a seven-day grace period on interest when a relief
of penalty is granted. This would help taxpayers who miss the filing deadline
by hours or a day.
Sales and Use Tax
-
Eliminate the irregular reporting and prepayment requirements
for the second quarter reporting period.
-
Clarify that any penalty is limited to a maximum of
10 percent for persons required to remit taxes by electronic funds transfer
and who fail to file a return, fail to remit by electronic fund transfer,
or fail to remit taxes.
Special Taxes
-
Provide relief for underground storage tank operators
from penalty and interest when they are unaware of responsibilities to
file reports and pay fees.
-
Conform provisions authorizing the board to issue determinations
for recovery of amounts erroneously refunded by the board.
-
Provide that the use fuel and diesel fuel tax laws will
be administered in conjunction with the International Fuel Tax Administrators
Articles of Agreement.
-
Amend insurers law to equalize the interest rate for
insurers and surplus line brokers.
-
Amend cigarette and tobacco products law to impose taxes
on seized inventory.
-
Amend cigarette and tobacco products law to include
a reseller in wholesaler definition.
-
Amend "911" laws to allow the BOE to require electrical
utilities and telephone service suppliers to post security, as necessary.
-
Amend "911" laws to allow for reporting periods other
than monthly.
-
Add authority to collect generator fee surcharge liabilities.
-
Amend hazardous substance tax law regarding disposition
of overpayments.
-
Amend codes related to the occupational lead poisoning
and childhood poison prevention fees.
-
Provide that underground storage tank fees be deposited
in the state treasury.
-
Include kerosene in the definition of diesel fuel.
-
Clarify refunds of diesel fuel.
Other BOE developments:
-
Advanced Appraisal Handbook. The Property Tax
Committee, chaired by Mr. Andal, adopted a Subject Matter Outline for the
Assessors' Handbook 502 on Advanced Appraisal. BOE staff will now begin
drafting the new handbook with the first draft due in March 1998. Also
approved by the committee was use of the publication Marshall Valuation
Service for commercial and industrial properties cost guides.
CONNELL CALLS FOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF FTB
Speaking at the Franchise Tax Board's California Tax
Policy Conference in San Francisco on November 6, State Controller Kathleen
Connell called for a top-to-bottom performance audit of the Franchise Tax
Board. Dr. Connell said she is also hopeful she can persuade the governor
and Legislature to order a performance audit of every department. She pointed
to the successes of a partial performance audit of the State Board of Equalization
and a full performance audit of the controller's office.
Dr. Connell, who serves as FTB chair, told an audience
of largely tax practitioners and business representatives that she had
helped eliminate a number of small, unfair nuisance taxes that increase
blood pressure of taxpayers more than they increase revenue.
For next year, Dr. Connell said she was going to
push for zero-based budgeting, consolidation of the FTB and BOE, a two-year
budget cycle, and a four-year capital improvement plan. She urged the budget
process be an open one, and was critical of the process of developing a
major tax bill behind closed doors on the last night of session.
She also said that she will be announcing an audit
of the California education system next month.
Other conference developments:
(Editor's note: Our November 10 issue covered developments
of the conference up to Caltaxletter deadline. This story covers
developments subsequent to that time.)
-
Telecommunications Apportionment Regulation.
FTB attorney James Peters said the FTB's proposed telecommunications apportionment
regulation (Section 25137-13) has "real merit" for sourcing of telecommunications
income. The principal change made by the regulation is the recognition
of the contribution of a market state in the sales factor, he added. Debbie
Gastler, representing the Times-Mirror Corporation, asked what evidence
the FTB has of distortion in order to justify a separate apportionment
regulation.
According to Mr. Peters, a second symposium on the
proposed regulation will be held next year.
-
Cox-Wyden Internet Tax Freedom. Walter Hellerstein,
University of Georgia law professor, discussed proposals to tax Internet
transactions, including one to expand the sales tax to downloading electronic
messages. Kendall Houghton, COST general counsel, said there is no one
position of business on the issue. She added that there is no way digital
products can be treated the same way as intangible property.
-
Alternative Minimum Tax. Due to a drafting error,
California's alternative minimum personal income tax exemption for 1997
will be increased to $45,000 for a joint return ($22,500 for a single return
and $33,750 for head of household). The Senate Floor Analysis of SB
1233 said the bill increased the AMT exemption beginning in 1998 (to
$57,260 for a joint return).
-
Elective Combination. Assembly Revenue and Taxation
Committee consultant Steve Kamp said that until parties can work out a
definition of a unitary business, the elective combination bill may "stall"
in the Legislature.
-
"Quickie Refunds." Virginia Gates, tax partner
of Price Waterhouse in San Jose, urged the adoption of a "quickie refund"
procedure whereby a taxpayer can get a refund before the end of the tax
year of an erroneous estimated payment.
-
Joyce v. Finnegan. FTB attorney Michael Brownell
said the FTB staff believes that its regulatory authority allows them to
overturn the Finnegan decision, if that is appropriate. According
to Sacramento attorney Eric Coffil, the BOE's Finnegan decision
held that for apportionment purposes, when sales are made into California
by a corporation not taxable in California, the sales are not "thrown back"
if any member of that corporation's unitary group is taxable in California.
The FTB's rulemaking authority (in Section 25106.5)
was passed by the Legislature in 1987, prior to the BOE's 1990 Finnegan
decision.
-
Combined Reports Mechanics Regulation. The draft
of the Combined Report Mechanics Regulation (25106.5) contains significant
issues for taxpayers. According to Mr. Brownell, there is a need for a
regulatory framework on the entirety of combined reporting.
In addition to the Finnegan v. Joyce controversy,
issues in the draft regulation include basic methodology, capital gains
and losses, accounting methods and elections, the interest offset, charitable
contributions, and application of Section 24425 in a group setting.
In the draft of the regulation, tax credits are
applied to specific member liability rather than to the unitary group as
a whole. Special rules for capital gain and loss netting are set forth.
First, the business or non-business determination is made, then an apportionment
percentage is applied, prior to netting of gain and loss.
Mr. Brownell said the interest offset portions of
the rule is still to be addressed, as well as assignment of all charitable
contributions to the parent of the unitary group (for purposes of determining
if the 10 percent limit has been exceeded). The practice of the FTB has
been to apply the interest offset on a combined basis but not tax credits.
-
IRS Data. Syracuse University Professor David
Burnham told conferees about the massive amount of IRS data he has accumulated
as a result of 13 Freedom of Information suits. This information may be
accessed by taxpayers free of charge at the following website: http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/.
He said the data show different criminal enforcement
by regions, noting that a taxpayer in Sacramento is more likely to be prosecuted
than one in Los Angeles. He added that there are regional variations in
audit, with the audit rate in Jackson, Mississippi higher than in New York
City.
FTB HEARS TAXPAYER RECOMMENDATIONS AT BILL-OF-RIGHTS
HEARING
A majority of the three-member Franchise Tax Board has
agreed to send a signal of support for AB 417 (Davis) on collective
combined reporting, but without a controversial unitary definition amendment
inserted into the bill late in the 1997 session.
FTB Chair Kathleen Connell and Member Ernest Dronenburg
made the commitment last Monday at a Taxpayers' Bill of Rights hearing,
where the public was invited to make suggestions about franchise and income
tax law. Abstaining was Finance Director Craig Brown.
Representing ARCO and the Counsel on Unitary Tax
(CUT), Barry Weissman asked the board to support collective combined reporting
as provided in AB 417, giving taxpayers the option of filing a report
with all affiliate companies, whether unitary or not. However, he asked
the board to oppose inclusion of a unitary definition. The bill will still
be pending when the Legislature reconvenes in January.
Mr. Weissman said the bill should not have been amended
in September to include a new definition in unitary standards for non-electors.
He said the change should be avoided because it is unnecessary, counterproductive,
premature and unworkable. The amendment uses unclear terms, and there is
no agreement on standards, he added.
Mr. Weissman said the unamended bill would improve
certainty to taxpayers. He continued that the fiscal impact to the state
would not occur until the fourth year or beyond. He cited one remaining
obstacle: taxpayers who do not elect combined reporting could be thrown
into uncertainty if the bill is allowed to include a unitary definition.
Others commenting before the board included Richard
Harris, representing Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. He proposed
that the board and department should emphasize collection of "the proper
tax" only and not be driven by the pursuit of revenue. He continued that
the public needs a perception of "fairness and equity," and he requested
the board to commit itself to the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights proposals he
submitted at last year's hearing. He called for a commitment to fair hearings
and requested support of standards that would prohibit what he termed coercive
practices by audit and collector staff.
Mr. Harris suggested that consideration of a shift
of the burden of proof would be desirable. Gerald Goldberg, FTB executive
officer, responded that many of Mr. Harris' recommendations are largely
contained in current and administrative procedures. Mr. Goldberg said the
agency would look at the appeals process to make it more staff-accessible
and non-punitive.
Other FTB action last Monday included:
-
Legislative Proposals. Approved Offer-in-Compromise-of-Tax-Liability
Authority (authorizing staff to settle issues up to $9,999. The board would
review items in excess of $7,500 informally); seek a hiring credit for
seasonal employees in economic development areas, and revise the estate
tax clearance requirement.
-
Homeowners and Renters Assistance Program. The
board authorized the staff to prepare regulations to implement the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 regarding denial of Homeowner
and Renters Assistance to illegal aliens, but directed the staff to revisit
the issue at the January meeting.
Dr. Connell raised questions concerning the board's
authority to determine resident and citizenship qualifications. Staff was
directed to coordinate with the Joint Legislative Audit Committee.
-
Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA) Member Fees.
The board questioned the fee for state membership in the FTA. It was reported
that New York and California pay annual fees of $71,000 and other states
and jurisdictions pay fees of a minimum of $9,000 up, based on proportionate
state tax revenues. Dr. Connell called these fees "egregious" and suggested
equal fees. She expressed the same view regarding fees to the Multistate
Tax Commission, and suggested lower fees or increased voting influence
on the basis of fees paid. Mr. Dronenburg is on the FTA subcommittee that
is examining fees and said he will pursue California's interest.
-
Telephone Services. Staff presented a comparison
of the average wait for the public to gain telephone access to the FTB.
The current wait averages five minutes, 56 seconds at FTB and four minutes,
six seconds at the BOE, officials said, noting that the BOE wait is being
reduced. Dr. Connell announced a desire to get the FTB wait down to two
minutes or less. Staff was directed to prepare a 1998-99 budget proposal
to add sufficient resources to accomplish the goal.
-
Chief Counsel. In executive session, the FTB
appointed Assistant Chief Counsel Brian W. Toman as chief counsel, replacing
Glenn Rigby who retired in July. Mr. Toman, director of the Multistate
Tax Bureau of the Legal Branch, has been at the FTB since 1975.
OAL APPROVES BOE'S INTERNET REGULATION
The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) has given final
approval to the State Board of Equalization's Sales and Use Tax Regulation
1684, relating to the application of the tax to out-of-state retailers
who use an instate Internet service provider. With OAL approval, the regulation
is effective Thursday, November 27, for which taxpayers can be truly thankful.
The regulation provides that an out-of-state retailer is not "engaged in
business" in this state within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code
Section 6203 if the retailer's only contact with this state is: (1) the
use of a computer server on the Internet to create or maintain a home page
on the World Wide Web, or (2) the use, under defined conditions, of an
in-state independent contractor performing repair services on behalf of
such retailer. It also provides that on-line service providers will not
be deemed the agent or representative of any out-of-state retailer.
COURT: SLOW ASSESSMENT BOARD MEANS USE OF TAXPAYERS'
VALUE
Taxpayers are entitled to use their values when a county
Assessment Appeals Board (AAB) fails to make a timely determination, a
state appellate court has ruled (Mission Housing Development Company,
et al., v. City and County of San Francisco).
The First District Court of Appeal on November 12
overturned in part the trial court's judgment that the San Francisco AAB
could deny a number of applications for reduction in Glenridge apartment
assessments filed by taxpayers for tax years 1985-86 and 1986-87. However,
the trial court was affirmed in part for disallowing refunds for tax years
1982-83 through 1984-85 and 1987-88.
Plaintiffs said the AAB failed to hear and make a
final determination on their applications within two years as required
by Section 1604 (c) of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The city argued that
the taxpayers had waived the two-year requirement. The court ruled, however,
that the city failed to plead waiver and estoppel issues as affirmative
defenses in its answer, and could not rely on those defenses.
The decision said the AAB failed to inform the taxpayers
of their lack of a full and complete filing of information on their applications,
a requirement of state law.
The conclusion that taxpayers' value must be used
applies only for tax years 1985-86 and 1986-87; otherwise the court found
that taxpayers' claims were not timely filed.
UI TAX RATES SHOULD GO DOWN IN 1998
California employers should see a reduction in their
unemployment insurance (UI) tax rates beginning January 1, 1998, saving
$170 million in the coming year and more than $520 million over two years.
The Employment Development Department's latest projections show the tax
rate schedule for 1998 will move to the "D" schedule. Employers currently
are on the "E" schedule.
The state's Unemployment Insurance Fund is projected
to end the year with a $3.64 billion balance, $460 million higher than
forecast in May. Exceptional economic growth during 1997 has slowed disbursements
from the fund (benefit payments) as well as increased contributions to
the fund (larger workforce). Employer contributions for 1997 are forecast
to be $3.04 billion, with 1998 contributions forecast to decline to $2.87
billion. On the "E" contribution rate schedule, employer tax rates range
from 1.1 percent to 5.4 percent of the first $7,000 in wages for each employee.
The "D" schedule ranges from 0.9 percent to 5.4 percent.
California's UI Fund has been steadily rebuilding
following a dramatic draw-down on reserves during the last recession. Saving
the fund from potential red ink was its healthy reserve when the recession
began. The year-end fund balance in 1990 had reserves of $5.4 billion,
but dipped to a low of $2 billion by the end of 1994.
On the "D" schedule, employers will again be able
to participate in California's "voluntary contribution" plan. This allows
employers to voluntarily pay an additional amount into their UI reserve
account in order to reduce their tax rate for the year. This option is
available only when the "D" or lower schedule is in effect.
PINOLE VOTERS REPEAL UTILITY TAX WITH PROP. 218 INITIATIVE
POWERS
Voters in Pinole (Contra Costa County) on November 4
probably were the first to flex the tax-repeal muscle of Article XIII,
Section C of the state Constitution. This section, providing initiative
powers to repeal a tax, was added in November 1996 when statewide voters
approved Proposition 218.
Jonathan Coupal, legal affairs director for the Howard
Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA) and the main drafter of the "vote-on-taxes"
Proposition 218 initiative, said he believes Pinole's Measure F was the
first use of the new Section C powers. A lawsuit against the non-voted
utility user tax was blocked by a statute-of-limitation problem, Mr. Coupal
said, so the plaintiffs mounted an initiative campaign to repeal the levy.
Measure F passed, 1,837 to 1,752.
Also, the Pinole City Council, as part of a settlement
of the HJTA lawsuit, agreed to put a real estate transfer tax on the November
ballot as Measure G. Voters rejected the proposal.
RECORD NUMBER OF SCHOOL BOND MEASURES ARE ATTEMPTED
Surveying all 58 counties, School Services of California,
Inc. (SSC), found a record 46 general obligation bonds for school facilities
were attempted on November 4, with a record-tying 25 of them passing. The
number of attempts surpassed the mark of 39 set in November 1995. The record
for approvals on one election day, 25, had been established last June when
38 districts sought bonds.
Successful elections amounted to more than $675 million,
led by Pasadena Unified's $240 million. Losers totaled about $579 million.
One election in Santa Barbara County had been too
close to call, trailing by one vote in initial ballot counting. But a later
count turned up the needed vote, election officials reported last Wednesday.
The final vote was 202 to 101 -- the two-thirds margin needed -- for the
$2 million bond to modernize and expand the Los Alamos Elementary School
District school for class-size reduction.
A new strategy was noted in the SSC report. As a
result of legislation effective last January (SB 1544, Peace, of
1996) districts can gerrymander themselves to enhance chances of bond passage.
Splitting the district for taxation purposes was
used by the Kings River Canyon Joint Unified School District, where eight
previous bond elections had failed, the last two by about 30 votes out
of some 10,000 cast. Attempting to isolate the anti-tax voters, the Fresno
County district was split into two parts. One had a $26 million bond, the
other a $3 million proposal.
The results: The pro-tax section of the district
was "indistinguishable" from the anti-tax section, wrote SSC's Bob Blattner,
and "the new strategy proved un- or even counter-productive." About 56
percent of voters in each section supported the respective bonds, which
was down some 10 percent from March and November 1995 elections when the
district voted as a whole.
POTPOURRI: SYMPOSIA, SIGHTINGS, SALUTES &
SNAFUS
LAO: POSITIVE FISCAL OUTLOOK. Legislative Analyst
Elizabeth Hill last Thursday reported that California's "fiscal outlook
is positive for the next couple of years." The report, called California's
fiscal Outlook, presents economic and budget projections through 1999-2000.
She attributes the state's good fiscal health to continued healthy economic
expansion and moderate revenue growth and ongoing declines in key health
and welfare program caseloads. Also cited is the decision by Governor Pete
Wilson to pay off the $1.2 billion Public Employees' Retirement System
debt in one lump sum, providing "room" for spending in other areas in subsequent
years. The general fund budget will be able to accommodate commitments
made in 1997, the report said. It said revenues will grow about 5 percent
a year, even after accounting for the phase-in of the tax-cut package.
KNOX CHAIRS ASSEMBLY REV & TAX COMMITTEE.
The new chair of the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee says his main
thrust is to look out for concerns of working families. Upon his appointment
by Speaker Cruz Bustamante, Los Angeles Democrat Wally Knox said on November
6: "I will focus on how state tax policy affects California's middle-class
families and pursue an agenda that addresses economic insecurity among
average working people."
COMING UP
Dec. 2: BOE MEETING WITH ASSESSORS
Location: Room 121, 450 N Street, Sacramento at
9:00 a.m.
Dec. 15: ASSEMBLY REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE
HEARING
Location: State Capitol, Room 447, at 9:30 a.m.
Subject: Mixed tax status of health systems.
Correction: In the last issue, the research
and development credit for 1998 and thereafter was printed as 12 percent.
This was a typo. The correct rate is 11 percent.
© Copyright 1997, California
Taxpayers' Association. All rights reserved.