|
Edwiges B. Hamblet is senior
manager, National Unclaimed Property Group, Deloitte & Touche (213)
553-1085 /
ehamblet@deloitte.com
|
|
Time
is running out on California’s amnesty program for reporting unclaimed property.
It expires December 31 and will have brought in more than $150 million in
unclaimed property to the state, according to preliminary estimates.
Holders of those properties that
qualify for amnesty will be forgiven the 12 percent statutory interest and
penalties.
The program is for property (not
including real estate), such as bank accounts, trust funds, escrow accounts,
matured or terminated insurance policies, estates, uncashed cashier’s checks or
money orders, certificates of deposit, safe deposit box contents and stocks,
mutual funds, bonds and dividends.
The state possesses more than $2.9
billion in unclaimed property that belongs to about 5.2 million individuals and
organizations, according to the state Controller’s Office, which manages the
program. Under the law, holders of the property, such as banks, have three years
to turn it over to the state, which then holds it forever. For example, contents
of a safe deposit box are sold and the proceeds kept in an account under the
owner’s name.
The Controller’s Office has a Web
site (www.sco.ca.gov)
where information on the UCP is available. There is a national site (www.unclaimed.org)
where anyone can check to see if they have a long-forgotten account, etc. In
some cases, owners are deceased and heirs have no knowledge of the property.
The Legislature enacted the amnesty
program with AB 1888 (Dutra) in 2000, and extended the deadline for
participating in the program for one year with AB 227 (Dutra) in 2002. It
applies to property that should have been reported by November 1, 1999, and is
not subject to a controller’s audit, or an investigation by the state attorney
general or litigation with the controller on or before January 1, 2003.
The state controller has until next
July to file a report on the program with the Legislature, but, according to
preliminary numbers, the amnesty program brought in approximately $90 million in
cash or property to the state during 2001, and officials believe some $50
million worth of unclaimed assets will be turned in during 2002 as a result of
the one-year extension.
According to the Assembly floor
analysis of AB 227, the program has had “tremendous success.” Governor Gray
Davis proposed extending the program in his proposed 2002-03 state budget,
expecting an additional $50 million in property to be turned in. The controller
reported that in 2001 the office received about $70 million in cash and about
$20 million in stocks under the amnesty program.
The state anticipated revenue of
about $35 million to be derived from increased payments and delivery of
unclaimed property as a result of the extended deadline.
Prior to passage of the unclaimed
property law, the holder of the property would have use of the money. A state
appellate court held in 1985 that holders of the property, such as banks, had no
interest in the assets. Thus the state’s unclaimed property law was enacted with
two objectives: reuniting owners with the funds or property and providing the
state, rather than the holder, the benefit of using the unclaimed funds or
property.
Unclaimed
property is any liability that has not been paid to the rightful owner within a
specified period of time. Although not a tax, unclaimed property triggers
similar obligations, including multi-state reporting and remittance
requirements.
Companies are
responsible for remitting unclaimed funds to the state of the owner’s last known
address, or if unknown, to the holder’s state of incorporation. Any company
that issues checks, maintains or writes off aged credit balances, or has had
merger or acquisition activity, offers customer refunds or gift cards, or is
publicly held, may have significant unclaimed property liability.
Currently
several states have amnesty or voluntary compliance programs to encourage
holders of potential unclaimed property to come forward and to prevent costly
audits.
If a company is
incorporated or doing business in California, and has outstanding liabilities,
it should take advantage of the California Amnesty Program,. Interest on
delinquent California remittances is statutory, and a further extension of the
California Amnesty Program would need to be approved through the legislative
process. |