|

Tom McClintock was first
elected to the state Assembly in 1982 from Thousand Oaks, serving
until 1992 when he was the Republican nominee for state controller.
He was elected to the state Senate in 1996. He is the GOP candidate
for state controller on the November ballot.
|
|
Editor’s Note:
On June 25, the California Senate debated and defeated (although reconsideration
was granted) legislation proposed by Senate President Pro Tem John Burton to
increase taxes by nearly $5 billion. The proposal, AB 428 (Assembly Budget
Committee), failed on a partyline 26-14 vote because it needed a 27-vote,
two-thirds majority of the 40-member house. Among other things, the bill would
have imposed 10 and 11 percent personal income tax brackets on high-income
Californians, starting with individuals at $130,000 of taxable income. Not
included in the taxes in this bill is the governor’s plan to roughly double the
state’s car tax, which would be replaced by Senator Burton’s so-called
soak-the-rich measure. Senator Tom McClintock was a leading speaker against the
measure. Following is the text of his remarks:
I
want to
compliment Senator Burton and the majority Democrats for recognizing, at least,
the crushing effect that more than doubling the car tax would have on struggling
families throughout California. That is a step in the right direction.
But they seemed to
have missed the larger picture, and that's why I'd suggest that they return to
the hearing room, but only after a huge sign is placed within the plain sight of
each conferee: "IT'S THE SPENDING, STUPID."
Now, I'm going to
set aside all the ideological issues involving boosting taxes through the roof,
and simply raise a practical concern: IT WON'T WORK.
That was our
experience in 1991. That is not a theoretical exercise. That was our practical
experience the last time we went through this drill. We had the biggest tax
increase by any state in American history –
it was supposed to bring in over $8 billion of new revenues. Instead, our
revenues barely budged. Those taxes broke the back of the economy, they turned a
recession into a near depression and created budget deficits for many years into
the future.
Now, between the
Legislative Analyst and the Republican caucus, more than $10 billion in simple
spending reductions were placed before the conference committee. Simple reforms
like conforming welfare eligibility to federal guidelines, reducing corporate
welfare and weeding out obsolete or duplicative agencies.
Instead we have
before us this piece of work. It's pretty clear they still don't get it.
This state is spending a larger portion of people's earnings than it has ever
spent in its entire history –
and it is delivering less with it than it's ever delivered in its entire history
–
and their only solution is to raise taxes. This state is spending almost twice
per capita what the state of Arizona spends to deliver a vastly higher quality
of services –
and their only solution is to raise taxes.
Now, if spending
growth during the Davis years had simply followed the combined rate of inflation
and population growth, the budget would still be 20 percent larger than it
was when Gray Davis took office; 20 percent larger. But instead of all these
tax increases we would instead have a $38 billion cumulative surplus. And
instead of talking about what taxes we're going to raise on people, we would be
talking instead about how do we rebate an average of $4,500 per every family in
California.
So let me try again:
this budget crisis is not the fault of taxpayers for not paying enough taxes. It is the fault of rampant waste and mismanagement practiced downstairs in the
corner office.
And the only message
of hope that I can offer to the people of California is this: we don't have to
continue another four years down this road. We can't afford to. And if the
people of California have finally had enough, we won't have to. |