|
Now that
the latest election cycle is over, it’s time we turn our attention to solving
one of the nation’s most important and vexing problems: education. Nothing is
more critical to America’s future. Our economic power is determined by many
factors, but education is arguably the most important.
At the same
time, our economy is becoming increasingly knowledge-based, creating new jobs
based on the raw material of ideas and technical innovation. According to the
National Association of Manufacturers, by 2010 there will be an estimated 5.3
million high-skill jobs available to qualified workers and 14 million more 10
years later.
Who will take
these jobs and will they all be located in the United States? The prospects
aren’t promising. Not when millions of American students are graduating from
high school without basic reading, writing and math skills. Nor when roughly 25
percent of U.S. students drop out of school without the skills to succeed.
When more than
60 percent of employers rate high school graduates’ skills in basic English and
math as fair or poor and when, according to one study, employer costs for
remedial training in one state have reached $40 million a year, it’s clear our
educational system is failing our students and our country.
But it’s not
just our own system of education we have to worry about. Over the past decade,
countries such as India, China, Russia and the nations of Eastern Europe have
emerged as a major force in the world’s economic marketplace. That’s a total of
about 3 billion people who didn’t participate in the world economy 10 years ago.
Even if just 10 percent of these people are well-educated (and it’s likely the
percentages are higher), that leaves roughly 300 million well-qualified new
competitors for technology jobs worldwide. This figure is about twice the size
of the U.S. work force and represents a massive shift in the competitive
environment for highly skilled jobs.
Other examples
of the competition we face from abroad: Several Latin American governments now
provide monthly stipends to poor parents who decide to keep their children in
school rather than send them out to work in factories or on the streets. Roughly
20 million people in Mexico, Honduras and Nicaragua already participate in such
programs. By 2006, 11.4 million families in Brazil (more than 45 million people
or a quarter of the population) will take part in this type of program.
Other nations
are quickly becoming the world’s leading providers of higher education. College
enrollments may be booming here in the U.S., but China graduates twice as many
students with bachelor’s degrees and six times as many engineering majors as the
U.S. India and Singapore are producing scientists through top-notch
undergraduate programs. In 2001, India graduated almost a million more students
from college than the U.S., including 100,000 more in the sciences and 60,000
more in engineering.
As the CEO of a
company that sells semiconductors and other high-value products that are used in
computing and communications equipment, I view the addition of more highly
educated individuals into the global economy as positive. Quite simply, it
broadens our base of potential end-customers and creates more worldwide demand
for our products. The fact that roughly three-quarters of Intel’s revenues are
generated outside of the U.S. is testament to the global nature of our business.
However, as an
American citizen, I find the increasing number of highly skilled workers
overseas and the focus that foreign governments place on education and
technology to be a major concern.
If we can’t
hire the workers with the training and skills we require, Intel and other
companies will find it necessary to move to those countries where the talent
resides. To state Intel’s position as simply as possible, we must hire the best
engineers in the world to stay competitive.
The solutions
to improving U.S. education require a great deal of focus and bold
leadership—from both government and business. From the government, recent
efforts to boost standards, measure results and increase accountability are
headed in the right direction. The No Child Left Behind legislation, which in
addition to a focus on standards and accountability also requires technology
literacy by the eighth grade, is clearly a good beginning.
However, we
must do more to ensure teachers have the training to teach the subjects they’re
presenting. Curricula must reflect an increased focus on science and math to
better prepare students and allow them to compete globally. Immigration rules
must be adjusted to allow foreign-born students educated at U.S. universities to
stay in the U.S. to add their talents to our economy. Today, we force these
individuals to leave the country –
in effect educating talent for our global competitors.
Business has an
important role to play, too. For our part, Intel spends more than $100 million
on programs designed to improve teaching and learning. Over the past several
years, we’ve trained more than 2 million teachers worldwide to use technology in
the classroom to improve student learning. We support programs to spur high-tech
research and support student excellence in dozens of U.S. universities. Intel
provides college scholarships to help young people succeed as our next
generation of scientists, mathematicians and engineers. We sponsor several
competitions and recognition programs to provide incentives for academic
excellence. Intel also posts tools and online resources for teachers on the
Internet and funds the Intel Computer Clubhouse network, where underserved youth
have access to high-tech resources to help provide job and life skills.
After years of
lower test scores and declining performance in our schools, it’s clear that
government alone can’t resolve all the problems our country faces regarding
education. Business must also step up to the challenge.
If America is
to compete effectively in the expanding knowledge-based global economy, it’s
imperative that government and business work together to do all we can to ensure
our young people are getting the quality education they deserve. The country’s
economic future depends on it. |