|

Bill Leonard, a native of San Bernardino, was
elected to the State Board of Equalization in 2002 after serving 24
years in the state Legislature as a member of the Assembly
(1978-1988); followed by eight years in the Senate and six more
years in the Assembly. This article is based on his testimony to the
CPR commission.
|
|
An old friend had a mantra that
summed up his criticism of so many government programs: “form over
substance.” He was right on target with that brief assessment. California’s
government has been more concerned with how things look than with what they do
and whether they are done well.
That is why I am excited
about the possibilities of the California Performance Review. CPR has been
diligent about reducing organizational layers and merging similar functions
under single structures. CPR does not merely rearrange deck chairs to get a more
appealing form; instead, it fundamentally restructures our government to be
focused on the substance of the work at hand.
Consider that currently the Franchise Tax Board (FTB)
collects state income taxes. The Board of Equalization (BOE) collects sales
tax, state-assessed property taxes, and some 40 other taxes. The Employment
Development Department collects employment taxes and the Department of Motor
Vehicles collects the Vehicle License Fee or “Car Tax.” How did we get come to
have so many different state agencies all performing the same substantive
function of collecting taxes?
Dave Doerr (Cal-Tax chief tax consultant and author of
“California’s Tax Machine,” a state history of tax laws) offers insight into
this mess by recalling how the Franchise Tax Board was created. At the time the
State Controller was feuding with the other four members of the BOE. The
Controller supported creating a new tax agency, the FTB, on which he would be
one of three votes instead of only one of the BOE’s five. And thus a new
department was born – not out of necessity, not out of
logical and coherent review of the substance of the matter, but simply as a
means to outwit political rivals.
Can we now, nearly a
century later, undo those political machinations and unravel the mounds of red
tape inundating taxpayers? CPR says we can. It recommends
that all of California's tax departments be blended into one body under the
elected members of the BOE. Such a California Tax Commission would enable
businesses and individuals to deal with one shop –
instead of several
– to get
taxpayer assistance and consistent application of the law.
Consolidation would
also allow the state to improve efficiency, and, ideally, save money. For
example, each of the tax collecting agencies has a cashiering unit to count and
deposit payments. With all the different deadlines and forms, each agency has
peaks and valleys in its workload that necessitate hiring temporary staff. And
while even the smallest retailer can now have money credited to their business
accounts within moments of the sale, the state takes days to do the same thing.
To my knowledge no one
– not the
Department of Finance, not the Auditor General
– has ever
looked at the efficiencies of each of these revenue operations, nor has anyone
ever developed a plan to take advantage of economies of scale or workload
management. Under a Tax Commission, we can do just that.
In
addition to better customer service and more efficient use of tax dollars,
having one body of elected officials responsible for the administration of
California's taxes will raise the level of accountability by establishing a
clear line of responsibility. Some insiders may object to this democratic ideal
out of fear that our rulings would be independent of the spending lobby that
currently reigns in Sacramento. That alone should be reason to support this
change.
The
only improvement I can suggest to CPR’s recommendation is that the new Tax
Commission should be made permanent by a Constitutional Amendment. The Tax
Commission promises to put common sense over political whims and substance over
form, all to the great benefit of California taxpayers. |