|

Bill Hauck is the chairman
of California Business for Education Excellence (CBEE), a group
created by major California businesses and business organizations to
restore excellence to California’s education system, and president
of the California Business Roundtable.
|
|
With the 2003 legislative session
fast approaching and a $21 billion budget shortfall, public education in
California finds itself at a critical crossroad. For the past decade, California
has taken some basic but important steps to improve its public schools. The
state has adopted standards reputed to be the best in the nation. It has a plan
for a testing program fully aligned to standards. It has taken unparalleled
steps to reduce class size and improve its teaching force and has made massive
investments in the K-12 school budgets. Despite the progress, the job is not
complete and California must remain on course to restoring excellence to its
schools.
One of the key issues facing the state at this time is the
implementation of and compliance with the
No Child Left Behind Act
of 2001 (NCLB). The Act, which was signed into law by President Bush in January,
redefines the federal role in K-12 education and is built upon the foundation
and basic framework of standards, assessment and accountability.
Hailed by many as the most meaningful education reform
in decades, NCLB focuses on bringing a variety of changes to schools
across the nation and represents billions of dollars in federal education funds.
In the first year alone California could receive nearly $5 billion in federal
funding.
To qualify for funding under NCLB, the state must meet
certain regulatory requirements and guidelines. Based on preliminary reviews of
California education policies, the state is well ahead of the pack, having many
of the requirements already in place. The state has already benefited from
several programs under NCLB, including receiving
nearly $133 million in August for the federal Reading First program, a
national initiative aimed at improving reading in kindergarten through
third grade, and being awarded a portion of the $23 million in federal grants to
help school districts and the state establish or expand public school choice
programs.
....federal education
funding will be tied directly to academic achievement
and will ensure that schools are
using taxpayer funds on programs that work. These new education reforms make
the best use of every tax dollar spent on education by funding programs that
follow good research, and by insisting on accountability and results. In that
way, taxpayers know what they're getting for their money, and parents know if
their children are learning.
California is also set to benefit from the more than $28
million in 2002-03 to help develop and implement a statewide student data system
of assessments. During the 2002 legislative session, the California Business
Roundtable and California Business for Education Excellence (CBEE) co-sponsored
SB 1453 (Alpert), which will establish a comprehensive statewide data system,
including unique student identifiers to obtain the individual student-level data
required by NCLB.
In order to fully comply with
federal law the state will still need to adjust some of its current programs and
policies in the coming months. One of the key issues at this time is
California’s definition of a “highly qualified” teacher. NCLB provides
significant support, nearly $3 billion this year alone, for states to beef up
teacher recruitment, training, and quality efforts. However, California’s
initial draft definition of a “highly qualified” teacher differs from the
federal law's minimum requirements and the state risks losing a portion of its
Title I funds. The issue has been the source of much debate and California’s
State Board of Education is currently revising its definition
to bring it in line with federal law.
Also being debated is the state’s definition of Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP). While NCLB requires all states to develop a statewide
index to monitor school performance, California already has a system in place –
the Academic Performance Index (API). The issue at stake is that California’s
system has slightly different goals than those contained in NCLB. The State
Board of Education is currently working with the U.S. Department of Education to
bring the state’s definition of AYP into line with the expectations of NCLB.
Conclusion
Under NCLB, and for
the first time in history, federal
education funding will be tied directly
to academic achievement and will
ensure that schools are using taxpayer funds on programs that work. These new
education reforms make the best use of every tax dollar spent on education by
funding programs that follow good research, and by insisting on accountability
and results. In that way, taxpayers know what they're getting for their money,
and parents know if their children are learning.
Given that a well-prepared workforce is the foundation of
California’s economic health, education must remain a top priority. The progress
we make in the coming year toward implementing the federal law will be vitally
important in determining how effective it will be. While the implementation of
NCLB provides the opportunity to significantly improve the course of education
reform in California, we need to ensure it
complements and builds upon the work that California already has accomplished.
Summary of NCLB on California
-
Benefits an estimated 6 million California
public school children, 8,566 California public schools, and 299,897
California teachers.
-
Increases federal education funding for
California to more than $5.4 billion to help local schools ensure that no
child is left behind - nearly $836 million more than last year, and a 41.4
percent increase over 2000 levels.
-
Increases Title I funding to more than $1.7
billion to boost the quality of education for disadvantaged children of
California - more than $410 million more than last year, and a 55.8 percent
increase over 2000 levels.
-
Provides more than $132.9 million in funding
for Reading First to ensure that every public school child in California
learns to read at or above grade level by the third grade.
-
Requires every classroom in
California to have a highly-qualified teacher and provides more than $333.5
million to train and retain skilled educators.
-
Provides an estimated $61.2 million to help
ensure safe and drug-free schools in California.
-
Provides an estimated $41.4 million to fund
after-school programs for at-risk children in California.
-
Provides more than $28.9 million in funding to
help California school districts assess how well children are learning and
schools are teaching.
-
Increases Pell Grant funding to an estimated
$1.2 billion - $86 million more than last year, and a 24.3 percent increase
over 2000 levels - to ensure greater access to a college education for
deserving California students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
U.S. Department of Education
|