|
This research brief provides
an overview of a book by Mark Baldassare, A California State of
Mind: The Conflicted Voter in a Changing World (2002, cloth, 240
pp., $29.95, ISBN 0-520-23648-3). The book, published jointly by the
Public Policy Institute of California and the University of
California Press, is available in bookstores or may be ordered by
phone at (800) 232-5343 [U.S. mainland] or (415) 291-4400 [Canada,
Hawaii, overseas] or through the Internet at www.ppic.org. The
Public Policy Institute of California is a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to independent, objective, nonpartisan
research on economic, social, and political issues affecting
California.
|
|
As California approached the threshold of the 21st century, it
seemed to be entering a golden era. Confidence in the economy was the highest it
had been in decades. Yet for the public, a dark shadow dimmed that golden glow,
making Californians less sanguine about the more distant future. That shadow was
largely distrust of government and lack of confidence that it could cope with
the formidable challenges taking shape in the state –
rapid population growth,
increasing racial and ethnic diversity, a crumbling infrastructure, congestion,
pollution, energy shortages, and a host of other problems that seemed to be
lacking the attention from government they deserved. In September 2001, the
nation suffered savage attacks on New York and Washington, and the hopes of
extending the nation’s all-too-brief period of peace, prosperity, and security
seemed to vanish overnight. The golden "era" in California proved to be more of
a golden "moment." Nonetheless, it provided deep insights into how distrust of
government has played out on the state’s social, economic, and political stage
and what it portends for the future of the state and perhaps even the nation.
|
Californians’
on Government |
|
"The whole government
system’s a bureaucratic mess." |
|
"Officials don’t listen to
us." |
|
"We don’t know where our
tax money goes." |
|
"They don’t deserve more
money unless they use it wisely." |
|
"No higher taxes for
better schools. We throw money at them. Accountability first. " |
|
"Growth is not the
problem—lack of planning and poor authority is." |
|
"Planning is
after-the-fact crisis management. There is no long-range planning." |
|
"Politicians fix only what
gets them elected." |
|
"I’d like it if we could
vote on everything, so they don’t make decisions for us." |
|
"This whole episode with
the energy crisis has totally shaken my belief in the government having a
grip on what’s going on." |
|
Source: Focus groups conducted with residents of San Diego, Los Angeles,
Sacramento, and Santa Clara (May 1999, April 2001). |
In A California
State of Mind: The Conflicted Voter in a Changing World,
Mark Baldassare examines the opinions, concerns, public policy preferences, and
ballot choices of Californians during the fleeting moment of prosperity that
roughly coincided with the 2000 election cycle. Baldassare first provides an
in-depth view of residents’ thoughts on several crucial policy issues: taxes and
government spending, public schools, and the environment. He then discusses how
rapidly changing demographics, particularly in the form of a growing Latino
population, are reshaping the state’s politics. He next turns his attention to
the ways in which political trends tied to distrust of government and elected
officials are giving California the character of an "un-party" state. By this, Baldassare means that political clout has increasingly come to reside outside
the major parties –
in the dual form of a growing number of independent voters and
an enthusiastic use of the initiative process. His discussion then focuses on
the other side of the 2000 elections and how the electricity crisis led
Californians into greater despair and made them even more uneasy about their
government’s ability to comprehend and effectively deal with the serious
problems facing the nation’s most populous state. Baldassare concludes with a
commentary on the insights discussed in the book and offers a series of
recommendations that might help restore Californians’ confidence in their
government and elected officials.
To gather data for his analysis, Baldassare convened 14 focus
groups and conducted 11 large-scale public opinion surveys throughout the state.
The surveys asked over 22,000 Californians between September 1999 and January
2001 about their public policy preferences; ballot choices; and political,
social, and economic perceptions and attitudes. Baldassare also used data from a
variety of other sources, including exit polls, election tallies, the U.S.
Census, government statistics, and national public opinion surveys, to round out
his analysis.
The Policy Environment
One of the most prominent themes in the book is that
Californians simply do not trust their elected officials to spend taxpayers’
money wisely or to be responsive to the public’s needs and desires. Even during
the economic prosperity and budget surpluses experienced at the end of the
Clinton administration, the tax revolt that began with Proposition 13 in the
late 1970s was a viable force. Baldassare observes that the message behind this
proposition
–
that voters are not pleased by the way governments go about their
taxing-and-spending business –
is one that the state’s elected officials correctly
fear is still a relevant and threatening force at the ballot box.
This distrust of government is evident in the political climate
surrounding the major policy issues of the day. For example, although
Californians named schools and education as the most important issue facing the
state, time and again in the surveys, they voiced their lack of trust in school
officials and state government. They supported allocating existing state funds
in a manner that favored schools, but they were not willing to pay higher taxes
to support increased school spending. Concerns about population growth and the
environment were also paramount in the public mind at the turn of the century.
But few residents expressed much confidence and trust in state government’s
ability to resolve environmental problems. Most preferred to implement local
growth controls through the initiative process.
Improving Governance in California
Baldassare offers a number of recommendations for improving the
process and inclusiveness of California’s democracy. All the reforms he suggests
involve the active participation of elected representatives, which he sees as an
essential ingredient in overcoming the public’s distrust of its political
leaders. He concludes that the idea of reform-from within –
leading to a
government that lives up to the public’s expectations of responsiveness,
efficiency, and effectiveness –
holds the most promise for California. Only this
can break the cycle of distrust that places government officials in the
unenviable position of lacking the resources needed to tackle problems because
the public does not trust them with the power or money to do so. Without the
proper resources and authority, further failures and disappointments by state
and local governments are inevitable and, in the end, the largest U.S. state
will remain woefully unprepared for its challenging future.
|