|
Sales Tax Exemption for
Manufacturing Equipment.
AB 80 (Houston),
AB 344 (Villines) and
AB 1580 (Torrico), exempting manufacturing and
telecommunications equipment from sales tax, were held by the committee
on the suspense file. An impressive array of taxpayers and taxpayer
organizations turned out, to no avail, to support
AB 1580. Speaking for the
California Manufacturers and Technology Association, Mr. Sutton said
economists on both ends of the spectrum say taxing manufacturing
equipment is poor tax policy.
MIC
for Very Tiny Businesses. Legislation providing a
sales tax exemption and corporate tax credit for purchase of
manufacturing equipment, but excluding almost all businesses, (AB
845, Ridley-Thomas) was held. Only taxpayers with gross
assets of $5 million or less used in the manufacturing process could
qualify.
Manufacturers Investment Credit.
Placed on suspense was
SB 552 (Alquist), providing
a full state sales tax exemption on purchases of manufacturing
equipment. Senator Alquist said the exemption would not go into effect
until the state’s economy improves. She said it was unfair under the
existing system to tax a company twice, first on investment and then on
production.
CTRA’s Goldberg said in opposition to
the bill that it is much broader than previous MIC measures, and
probably would result in a $3 billion annual revenue loss to the state.
He suggested that revenue-neutrality discussions commence, offsetting
the revenue loss with a split-roll property tax. No one seemed to react
to this specific “offer.” However, Senator Mike Machado, the committee
chair, said he agreed that business “inputs” should not be taxed and
added that it “is somewhat premature” to consider this bill “given the
(tax system) structural problems in the state.” He reiterated that he
would hope the Legislature would not engage in piecemeal tax policy
changes.
MIC: Bills Would Restore
the Tax Credit as reported in Caltaxletter, March
4, 2005. MIC Sales Tax Exemption:
AB 845 (Ridley-Thomas) beginning
on or after January 1, 2006, allows a sales tax exemption for property
purchased for “manufacturing, processing, fabricating, or recycling of
property,” and revives the 6% tax credit for the amount paid for
qualified property. The sales tax exemption and tax credit would cease
on the earlier of: January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2011, respectively
–
or a specified employment determination by the EDD.
MIC: Meat or Poultry Processing.
AB 1028 (Jerome Horton) allows a 6% corporate tax credit
for qualified property, as defined. In general, the credit would be for
property used for manufacturing and processing meat or poultry, as
provided.
MIC: Telecommunications and Manufacturing Equipment.
AB 1580 (Torrico) declares legislative intent to exempt
from sales tax manufacturing equipment and telecommunications equipment
used in the manufacturing process.
MIC: Research and Development Activity.
SB 552 (Alquist) exempts from
sales tax purchases manufacturing equipment, including research and
development activities, as specified. The bill provides that for
purchases made on or after January 1, 2006, the exemption be implemented
through a specified refund procedure, and states that the exemption
would apply to local sales or transactions and use taxes, unless the
governing body of the taxing county, city, or district votes otherwise.
Expanded MIC Revived.
SB 631
(Dutton) exempts from sales tax
purchases of manufacturing equipment, including generation of
electricity, and revives the 6 percent income and corporate tax credit
for purchase of qualified property, as defined.
Manufacturers’ Investment Tax Credit.
AB 344 (Villines) state legislative intent to restore the
manufacturers’ investment tax credit.
BOE Approves More MIC
Sales Tax Refunds as reported in Caltaxletter,
January 28, 2005.
Manufacturing Equipment Exemption
Regulations Repealed. The board repealed
Sales Tax Regulation 1525.2 and
1525.3, relating to the manufacturing equipment sales tax
exemption on the theory that the exemption expired at the end of 2003.
Staff presented the action as a Section 100 change, with no regulatory
effect. This procedure exempts the process from notice and public
hearing requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. (Caltaxletter,
December 17, 2004)
Sales Tax Refunds of Unusable MIC
Credits Granted. Three sales tax appeals involving refunds of
amounts of manufacturers’ investment credit not able to be claimed on
corporate tax returns were approved by the board. (Appeal
of Lightwave Electronics Corporation,
Appeal of Grundfos Holding Corporation
and Appeal of Conextant Systems). In the
Lighthouse case, which was
the lead case, the taxpayer, a Mountain View corporation and leader in
laser technology, had used its FTB liability by claiming R&D credits. It
filed for a sales tax refund for the amount it could have claimed on its
corporate tax return if it had not used its R&D credits. Board staff
denied the claim. Representing the taxpayer, Jon Sperring of
PricewaterhouseCoopers, said it was legislative intent that taxpayers
who filed prior to August 7, 2003 could claim sales tax refunds of
unused tax credits. He then played a tape of the legislative debate on
SB 1064 (Burton) on the Assembly floor to demonstrate the
legislative intent that taxpayers with claims for sales tax refunds be
grandfathered in. BOE staff attorney Brad Heller argued that the MIC
statute prohibited taxpayers from claiming a sales tax credit if they
could not claim the credit on their corporate return. After the
Lighthouse case was decided
for the taxpayer on a 4-0 vote (Yee-abstaining), the other two cases
involving the same issue were decided on the same stipulated arguments.
On the Conextant case,
Mr. Chiang was not participating and out of the room, so the vote was
3-0. (Caltaxletter, December 17, 2004) Manufacturing
Personal Property Purchase Tax Credit.
AB 2484 (Ridley-Thomas) was amended May 18, 2004 to delete prior
contents and add provisions establishing a 6 percent tax credit for
purchase or lease by a small manufacturing business of specified
property. The bill also provides for a sales tax exemption for such
property. Property eligible
for the credit includes property used for manufacturing, processing,
fabricating, testing pollution control or recycling. Computer software
is also included. It is unclear
whether “capital labor” is included. One provision requires a sales tax
to be paid on the property, except for computer software. Another
provision says “qualified property” means “the value of any capitalized
labor costs that are directly allocable to the construction of the
property described (above).” In order to be a
“qualified taxpayer” eligible for the credit, the taxpayer must:
Have as its principal business activity in businesses described in Codes
331 to 339999 of NAICS (North American Industrial Code System).
Have “gross aggregate gross assets” in the manufacturing activity that do
not exceed $5 million.
Maintain or increase the average number of manufacturing jobs reported in
2003.
Agree to provide the Franchise Tax Board with additional information and
permit the FTB to disclose the information with the Legislative Analyst.
Both
the sales tax exemption and the tax credit will sunset in the earlier of the
year (after 2006) when total statewide employment has not increased by
25,000 or more above the base year, or January 1, 2011.
|