

Back to Cal-Tax In The News
Inside Taxes
Dealing with deadbeats
By LISA MARTIN
Special to the Daily Transcript
June 28, 1999
There is a critical need for effective child-support enforcement
as parents fail to meet their obligations and millions of California
children suffer. And taxpayers are left holding the bag for a
broken system.
This negligence of non-custodial "deadbeat" parents
has forced many custodial parents to seek state assistance for
their families at the expense of taxpayers. Not only must taxpayers
fund the increase in demand for social services, taxpayers also
must fund the child-support enforcement and collection efforts.
Obviously, ineffectiveness of this program is a major blow
to taxpayers, as well as business, families, educators and all
Californians who have a stake in providing children the resources
they need to survive.
Statistics associated with this problem are staggering. To
date, about $8.5 billion is owed to nearly 4.5 million California
children. Only $1.4 billion, however, was collected in 1997-98.
This collection rate forces many children to survive on welfare
benefits and causes an unnecessarily increased social safety-net
cost for California taxpayers.
Other problems include:
Nearly 65 percent of children on welfare are owed child
support, and five of six of these children are not receiving
any child support at all. In California's largest county (Los
Angeles County), only 10,000 of 400,000 current collections are
made for single parents on welfare.
Many county management information systems are not established
to adequately track parents to collect delinquent funds, or,
even worse, to transfer collected funds to recipient children.
For example, in Los Angeles County, millions of collected dollars
were not distributed because recipients could not be located.
Seeking solutions, performance in child support enforcement
service can be improved by the following taxpayer-friendly actions:
Facilitate policy changes and state-level assistance that
enable counties to form better partnerships with the state and
yield-improved outcomes with child-support enforcement.
Before reinventing the wheel, allow for competitive-service
delivery, utilizing highly experienced, state-of-the-art private
companies to perform specialized child-support enforcement services.
Examine successful child-support enforcement models, including
competitive-service delivery, in other states.
Two examples of innovation prove that, with flexibility and
partnering with experts in the field, efficiencies can be achieved.
In Illinois, Cook County has partnered with an outside organization
to perform review and modification of support orders, as well
as income withholding for those who fail to pay their child support.
This partnership has streamlined Cook County's child-support
enforcement process and significantly improved its collection
rates.
Montana has partnered with a private entity to perform the
state's customer service function, allowing Montana's child-support
staff to devote more time to increasing collections. The private
entity provides the key education function, interviews custodial
parents to support paternity establishment and verifies the identity
of non-custodial parents.
So far this year, the California Legislature has made progress
toward reforming the system, and it should be encouraged to thoroughly
consider innovative approaches to child-support enforcement problems.
The Senate has approved SB 542, authored by Senate President
Pro Tem John Burton. As summer arrived, this measure was pending
in the Assembly. Meanwhile, Assemblymember Sheila James Kuehl's
AB 196 cleared the Assembly and was pending in the Senate.
The Burton measure would create a state Department of Child
Support, consolidate efforts and seek accountability. The Kuehl
bill would require the governor to appoint an undersecretary
for child support to manage the program and come up with uniform
standards and procedures. Both bills would take child support
enforcement away from district attorneys in the state's 58 counties
-- a primary reason the current system that has not done the
job.
It is anticipated that the Burton and Kuehl measures will
result in a Senate-Assembly conference committee to hammer out
a compromise before the Legislature quits for the year in September.
Taxpayers should take a keen interest in the outcome.
Lisa Martin is a policy analyst for the California Taxpayers'
Association.
Back to Cal-Tax In The News |